發新話題
打印

[吉他-樂器] Archtop Material

Archtop Material

想請問ㄧ下,有關Archtop的用料!
如同Gibson Es-175 一個系列就有相當多的不同!
原則上可以分別為下列:
Neck: Maple or Mahogany
Top: Maple
Back:Maple or Mahogany
Side:Maple or Mahogany

原則上Body是使用合板,不知道是否是符合當時琴的定價!
80` 70 ` 60` 的材質各有不同, 是否音色有不同?或是其他因素!
Thanks a lot !

TOP

laminate top hollow body guitar (i try these brands:- Ibanez, Gibson, D'aquisto, sadowsky Jim hall model) they are using Press Top
Wood use Maple / Mahogany on top
sides will use Maple / Mahogany

Craved top (I try Prs Archtop) i see they use spurce / maple top
sonically spruce produce a brighter sound (the best material in violin making use craved spruce on top)

Since hollow body guitars we are talking using PU for pick up the signal, i dun see there is a big difference (tone, sustain, attack can be more or less adjust using outboard amps / EQs)
so in short, using maple (flame/quit) can sold more money and less $ on spurce

Research  being told laminate top more resistant to feedback. whilst craved top is use more wood higher degree of craftsmanship)

in my experience, if you try to chase the "Old sound" try to change the bridge from ABR style bridge to wood bridge, this will produce a different tone more "wood like"

i try it on a es175 (change from metal bridge to wood bridge) the sound change from electric to acoustic feel

TOP

bosica 你太帅了耶,我学到好多耶,以后肯定免不了向你请教




[ 本文章最後由 nunuxin 於 8-24-2008 14:51 編輯 ]

TOP

我在國內拍賣看到一把琴!
http://tw.f5.page.bid.yahoo.com/tw/auction/e28162828
這把是Maple Neck !與一般175所使用的Mahogany不太一樣!
請問差別在哪邊?感謝!

TOP

據說.......... (我也是聽別人講的啦! )
Maple(楓木)因為材質比較硬, 所以聲音比較亮, 比較清脆
Mahogany(桃花木)質地比較沉重, 所以音色比較厚實

不過用在琴頸上是否依然如此, 我就不是很清楚了......
這還是留給比較有研究的板友來回答吧!

TOP

回覆 #5 Eric 的文章

Maple(楓木)因為材質比較硬, 所以聲音比較亮, 比較清脆
Mahogany(桃花木)質地比較沉重, 所以音色比較厚實

ㄛ..我沒有極深入的研究,不過我同意老師得到的資訊~
對我來說Maple的琴聲音較偏亮,後來我自己還蠻喜歡的,
然而日後有機會的話,能試些不同木材的Archtop也不錯。

TOP

發新話題